Again this is really interesting stuff and I am glad
we are talking about it. Personally I am moved by the critical pedagogy
concepts and I think it looks like a really super good way to teach. Then again
I can see how hard it will be to incorporate critical teaching into all of my
lessons.
I think this study is very useful. It seems to
present the information in a mostly impartial way and acknowledges the bias
toward critical pedagogy right from the start. That being said the examples
given of actual classroom lessons and interactions seem very useful.
In college I have had a few experiences with
inclusion of pop culture into the curriculum. In English 201 we listened to,
read the lyrics for, and analyzed a popular band’s album in much the same way
we would a book. I felt like the class really responded to this kind of
different approach to interpreting literature so the discussions were livelier
and more students participated. I have also had experiences where hip hop music
was analyzed like poetry and felt similarly that my classmates were more
interested and engaged than when we read Keats. If this works well in college
then why not high school?
I think I identify with the statement on page 190, “We
sought to encourage a critical dialogue whereby our students would understand
that they possessed the individual and collective ability to achieve even
within a structure that can be labeled as oppressive.” So the goal isn’t to recognize
the oppression, but to recognize that it does not limit them. I like this.
Especially in relation to the movie Stand
and Deliver which my educational psychology class viewed as well. It is an
inspirational movie and the teacher is a hero! But at the end of that film I
just kept thinking, “What good does calculus do those kids after the class
ends?”
No comments:
Post a Comment